![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
| |||||||
|
Welcome to Mazdaspeed Forums . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. *When you join MSF as a registered user, there will be No Ads. *Registered Members get access to the Off Topic Area of the Forum *Registered Members have an opportunity to upgrade their accounts to VIP, which brings a host of goddies for supporting MSF such as Raffles, Additional Forum Access, More PM Storage, The ability to upload more Images and many other enhancements. *Registered members also get access to the live chat box! |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
![]() | | #1 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score Hello; I am tuning a stage 3 for a mazdaspeed 6 with turbo BNR S4. Now I'm adjusting a map by boost. I have a sensor map of 3 bar. The problem is that I can not exceed the constant 26psi. If I adjust the boost objective to 27/28 psi and the corresponding wgdc, I only get a peak pressure. Next, the ecu decreases the prfesion to 25 / 26psi. As the boost targets are higher, the pressure rises again and the ecu corrects again, resulting in a saw-shaped boost line. I do not know what should limit the boost / load. All the pressure and load tables are superior to 26psi, but the ecu does not allow to execute more maintained pressure. |
| | |
![]() | | #2 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score This is the boost line in wot. IMG-20190526-WA0063.jpg If I set the boost target to 25/26 psi, the boost line is flat and stable. What's going on? |
| | |
![]() | | #3 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score The other problem is that the ecu does not obey the ignition advance correction table "COOLANT TEMP / BAT" When the bat increases, the ecu can subtract half a degree or one degree. Sometimes nothing remains. I do not get it. IMG_20190527_235732 (1).jpg |
| | |
![]() | | #4 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: Near Charlotte NC
Posts: 2,498
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 55
Thanked 712 Times in 555 Posts
Groans: 23
Groaned at 6 Times in 5 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score There is a WGDC boost target correction table to tell the ECU how to adjust WGDC to achieve target. If set too agressive, you will have a sawtooth boost line.
__________________ '06 MS6 GT-167k Miles(Forged@157,116) Manley Pistons & Rods, King Bearings Stock Head/Cams, Stock Int/Exh Manifolds Versatuner, 3-bar MAP, ITV22, CP-e TMIC CS Turbo/DP/RP/HPFP/BPV/R-DiffMount White Widow F-DiffMount, Whiteline RSB Rear Russian Bushings, Poly FSB Bushings Magnaflow CBE, ACT 6-puck/Streetlite JBR Tru-3.5/3-port EBCS/EGR-D Damond RMM/PMM/OCC/PCV Plate Other rides: 2014 F-150 XLT SuperCrew Ecoboost 2002 Tacoma ExtCab 2.4L 5spd 2WD 2004 Olds Alero ECOtec 2.2 - Broken History: 2008 GSX-R 1000 - Stolen 1988 RX-7 TII - Sold (13.467 @ 105.44) 1985 Camaro - Sold (est. 265bhp 5.7 swap, Edelbrock intake & Hooker headers) |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Fstrnyou For This Useful Post: | Mr Charge (05-28-2019) |
![]() | | #5 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score Thanks for the reply. The wgdc correction table is not aggressive. The previous image is the boost line with a target at 27'5psi. This is the boost line with a target of 26psi. The whole map is identical. The line is almost perfect. If I try to overcome that boost, the abrupt corrections begin. I'm talking about boost but maybe the limit is in the load. The records indicate the limit around 2.5 load. IMG_20190528_230654.jpg |
| | |
![]() | | #6 | ![]() |
| Police - Grammarhead ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,279
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 3745 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 8,744
Thanked 7,032 Times in 2,825 Posts
Groans: 1,911
Groaned at 45 Times in 26 Posts
| AHA! You may have run into the infamous load cap in the ECU. What are you using to tune your car? Check out these threads: AFR targets at loads higher than 2.50 ATR/ATP fix Load Glitch
__________________ Having trouble finding something on MSF? Use MS3Shadow's search tool:SEARCH MSF HERE! |
| | |
![]() | | #7 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score
| |
| | |
![]() | | #8 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,233
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 161
Thanked 596 Times in 476 Posts
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score I got an issue a long time ago with my first attempt to self tune my BT setup, (it may be similar or not)......The ecu was constantly dialing back wg duty at higher rpm...a lot below my targets. . i was able to boost correctly below but i wasn't able to make any kind of BT boost at high rpm..... Someone just suggested to me to change 2 parameters that wasn't easily looking any close to be related but it solved my issue. Load target comp high rpm (Beta) to 0 Load target comp injector base offset (beta) to 20.00 Back then, i was not believing it would work and i gave a try without dialing back the previous changes i made to boost target, wg duty and other boost tables.......When i did test the wot pull, it overboosted way too much, ran lean above my fueling capacity with knock and broke a plug and a piston ringland for just few seconds.....just be carefull....I learned it the hard way.
__________________ Mazda for life...or until i can afford something better... 2007 rusted Speed6... Forged with meth and a 3076 in progress... 1993 Ford Probe KLZE 143dB 2012 Mazda3 Gs-sky 6.5l/100 when transporting speed parts 1989 GM 6.2 diesel pickup Wife drive 2010 CX7 2007 speed3 burned (i'm proud to ran 12.7s with it) ...Because French Canadian... If you check for leaks and you didn't made a test under compressor pressure, you aren't done checking for leaks.... |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff23spl For This Useful Post: | Mr Charge (06-04-2019) |
![]() | | #9 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score
I have put the values that you have told me and it has not worked. Thank you very much for the contribution. IMG_20190603_230322.jpg | |
| | |
![]() | | #10 | ![]() |
| Police - Grammarhead ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,279
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 3745 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 8,744
Thanked 7,032 Times in 2,825 Posts
Groans: 1,911
Groaned at 45 Times in 26 Posts
|
It looks like the waveform of the compensation has changed, so the adjustments you made did have an effect, it just didn't completely iron out the fluctuations. Attachment 237671 I'm not sure that I'll be able to view your map, but would you mind attaching it to your next post? I'll try and open it to see if there's anything obvious that needs to be changed.
__________________ Having trouble finding something on MSF? Use MS3Shadow's search tool:SEARCH MSF HERE! | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Vansquish For This Useful Post: | Mr Charge (06-04-2019) |
![]() | | #11 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2019 Location: Spain
Posts: 19
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score The conditions of registration were not exactly the same, but something improved its operation. The problems of loading and ignition advance are not the only ones that I have. And the COBB Accesport platform and the ATR program do not help me. They have tables that do not correspond to what they indicate and hidden tables, etc., which make reprogramming very difficult in people who do not know these traps. I have tried to reprogram because I like to learn this, I'm passionate about it. The goal is not to save money. It's learning and enjoying along the way. But I do not want to endanger the engine. I'll trust Freektune to adjust a map. I have read that they are good professionals. I will put the results here. Thanks for the help |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GM recalling 8.4M cars, 8.2M related to ignition problems | Haltech | Automotive News | 1 | 07-01-2014 10:51 AM |
| Some ignition advance input please | Voltwings | 2010 MS3 - ECU Computer Tuning | 20 | 07-25-2013 04:02 PM |
| AP Ignition map - Load vs Boost Target | Zep | MazdaSpeed 3/6 - ECU Computer Tuning | 0 | 05-10-2012 02:58 PM |
| Higher boost and less ignition advance vs. more advance/less boost | bast525 | Cobb ATR Support | 31 | 06-03-2010 04:53 AM |